Biden did “technological devastation” to China, whereas Ren Zhengfei was quite the opposite pro-American. Why?
“Is China a part of the world? Yes. So our pursuit of globalization includes localization. We cannot be closed, we have to open up. We must continue to insist on learning from the United States. “
The above paragraph comes from the recently published by the Hawaiian Jincheng Community “Symposium on the Symposium between President Renu and the Gold Medal Staff Representative in 2020”. After seeing angry President Trump, Biden came to power today. A series of five steps to control China, each more ruthless than the other, transcends unbearable boundaries that can be described as “technological destruction.”
Biden has five tricks against China. 1. Plan to pass US innovation and competition laws and allocate US $ 250 billion to completely control China’s technological competition; 2. The United States National Security Council issued a statement identifying and targeting China as a major national security interest against corruption; 3. 59 Chinese companies were targeted. Individuals and businesses in the United States should be blacklisted; 4. Calls for a ban on China’s participation in the preparation of global trade and technology regulation; 5. America’s Distribution Chain Trade Action Group is preparing to provide more specific answers in key technology areas such as public semiconductors and batteries. China attacks.
Huawei is precisely the central goal of “extinction”. How can Ren Zhengfei ask the United States for help? This is a question from one of the Hawaiian employees of the business group. He said to Ren Zhengfei, “Because of the US sanctions, our business is very difficult. In the future, too, Hawaii is ready to learn from the USA under the conditions of globalization that we must be determined to go in the right direction. “
This comment was visited by people and even netizens who later saw the article were confused. In fact, anyone can ignore Ren Zhengfei’s speech prototype. He first pointed out that “the United States is not the same as the United States where Sen Ping and Ren Zhengfi spoke”.
Chen Ping is a researcher at the China Research Institute at Futan University. In the 1980s he studied physics in the USA. He then switched to economics and lived in the USA for a long time. In-depth observations and extensive research into China’s economy and finance have drawn more than 2.1 million “fans”. Following Trump’s attack on China, Chen Bing published a series of commentaries exposing the lack of social and economic fabric in the United States and reminding China not to blindly follow the US response and win the vibes of intelligent people. Not learning from the United States has become one of the mainland ideas. Should Ren Zheng Fight This Internet Celebrity Scholar? not that.
Ren Zhengfi pointed out that Sen Ping was speaking about the political community in America. “For politicians, social issues are inexplicably complex. Science is real. There is only one answer. Science and education are relatively simple. America is powerful in this regard. It’s very strong. Do not think America is not a teacher because it oppresses us. Don’t learn from America. Leads to depression. “
To use an analogy when Sen Ping says America is a rotten ship, Ren Zhengfei does not see that rotten ship cruising, but rather focuses on the three pound nails on the rotten ship. Yes, it’s very long-lived – so we can still benefit from the United States.
In 1997, Hawaii introduced IBM’s Integrated Product Development (IPT) model. It took 10 years and RMB spent $ 4 billion on consulting fees. In return, it trained a team of the Hawaiian management elite and reformed Hawaii to an international level. Scientific and technical institutes.
At the end, a gold medalist asked: “The international environment has now changed a lot. Our relationship with overseas suppliers has become a major obstacle and is becoming more and more difficult. What suggestions do you have? “
Towards the end of the article, I quoted how Ren Zhengfi “raised” a co-worker as a reader: “First we have to work well together, work honestly with others. The work is difficult, of course, not a difficulty. Why do you want to get paid so much? ”That way, I hope everyone understands.